Which method is considered to cause the least amount of damage during forcible entry on a door?

Using a lock box is considered the method that causes the least amount of damage during forcible entry because it involves locating a secure container where a building owner or facility manager might have placed keys or access codes. This method prioritizes preservation of the door and surrounding structure, minimizing damage associated with more invasive entry techniques.

In contrast, prying a door jamb can not only damage the door itself but potentially the frame, making repairs more complicated and costly. Breaking the glass can create hazards, such as sharp edges and security concerns, while also necessitating repairs to the glass and possibly the door. Cutting a hole in the roof, although sometimes necessary, can lead to significant structural damage and cost, often requiring extensive repair work afterward. Therefore, searching for a lock box is an efficient alternative that maintains the integrity of the entrance while allowing for an effective means of access.